. . . to create a great looking garden?
If you blog about gardening like me, it likely means you are an over-the-top gardener who rarely resists adding new plants to your plot. There are so many great plants available to us these days that it is easy to think that a great garden needs a vast palette of plants to look good in all seasons. Not true as this stunning garden created by Sarah Price at Garsington in Oxforshire in the UK proves.
On her website, Price says that in 2004, she was given the commission to redesign the planting for a historic house. "Low maintenance planting was central to the garden’s redesign." A simple plant palette of Sedum, Salvias, Origanum, Erigeron and Stipa gigantea were used to provide "year round structure, texture and colour."
Looking at the photos there are a few things she did not mention like two kinds of Alliums and Russian Sage and a pretty little orange flower that I can't identify but generally the plants are all things that are widely available and not particularly fancy or unusual.
Of course a beautiful house with a brick-paved garden and high hedges has a lot going for it before any plants are put in the ground. And yet, these simple plants provide scenes that I would not tire of during the season. And they suggest that we may be letting our love for plants confuse us about what we need — and how much — to make a garden. It certainly has given me a lot to think about as the garden year is about to start again.
Photos via Sarah Price and Rachel Warne
Oh my goodness, I love this. I'm moving more and more into shrubs and grasses, looking for easier maintenance and less weeding (hopefully). I have different varieties of spirea, which like to self seed, so the young ones are going to be used to fill in as I get the garden more under control.
Posted by: Barbara H. | Monday, March 05, 2018 at 10:42 AM
A masterfully designed and planted garden; an excellent reminder that an easy care garden with common plants can be stunning. This is a lesson I may learn someday but for now, I'm still reveling in having way too many plants.
Posted by: Peter/Outlaw | Monday, March 05, 2018 at 12:59 PM
Excellent post, Linda. This is, indeed, thought-provoking. I keep thinking I need to do more dividing and rearranging. I have several Hellebore patches--just one plant example--that I need to divide and move to additional locations. It is tempting to focus too much on "new" plants.
Posted by: Beth @ PlantPostings | Monday, March 05, 2018 at 03:52 PM
I think this may be easier for a designer to do than for us plant geeks.
Posted by: Linda Brazill | Monday, March 05, 2018 at 04:13 PM
I absolutely agree... but I will respectfully decline the offer to reconsider masses of different and obscure plants. Reading your post makes me realize I enjoy a pretty scene but for me it's all about the plants! -Judging by the well balanced serenity of your garden I suspect you do a much better job of balancing the two than I do!
I'm looking at Price's garden and I'm thinking two things. The plantings add so much to the scene (vs turf or bedding) and I bet they're actually lower maintenance than the weekly drudge of lawn mowing. Interesting how well low maintenance can succeed.
Posted by: Frank | Tuesday, March 06, 2018 at 07:45 AM
So pretty! I've heard designers say that you really only need like 5 types of plants, and that you should just keep repeating those plants throughout the garden. I'm way too much of a plant lover to restrict myself to just a few, though!
Posted by: Indie | Tuesday, March 06, 2018 at 08:04 AM
I'm not positive but I am guessing there may be other garden areas at this old house. So this may not be the only garden they see. And definitely lower maintenance than grass. I have managed to use large areas of one kind of plant here and there in the garden. I have a lot of obscure spring ephemerals and some unusual things in one or two locations by paths. You know how it is: the more you garden, the more quirky things catch your eye!
Posted by: Linda Brazill | Tuesday, March 06, 2018 at 08:11 AM
I do have some favorite plants that I spread around but I could never limit myself like this. Still it was a surprise to see how well it all worked.
Posted by: Linda Brazill | Tuesday, March 06, 2018 at 08:21 AM
I think it would be easier to do if you aren't emotionally attached to your garden. I do like variety. However, my garden does have a lot of repeats especially when I take a notion to expand a flower bed. It seems that I start out with a few new plants then "fill in" with some of the plants in my garden that need to be thinned. I still have a difficult time putting a perfectly good clump of a plant into the compost. A friend of mine asked me once if I didn't believe in euthanasia. ha...
Posted by: Lisa at Greenbow | Tuesday, March 06, 2018 at 04:13 PM
And this is my single greatest gardening challenge: Love of plants vs. outstanding design. It seems odd that the two do not go hand in hand, but more often than not I find that I have to restrain myself, and in the areas where I am successful, my garden is better for it. You'd think these years as a journalist and editor would have taught me a lesson about this, wouldn't you?
Posted by: Erin @ The Impatient Gardener | Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:22 AM
Too funny that after 30 years as a journalist and editor, I never made that connection. I am much better cutting my words than my plants. I am trying to put most of the special ones in a limited spot where you can see them up close.
Posted by: Linda Brazill | Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:39 AM
In my early acquisition & planting days, I bristled at the designer's formula for improving gardens with too many "drifts of one": Take out a third of the plants and replant with multiples of the best third of the remaining ones.
Then came a time when I was away from the garden for almost a decade, and nature carried out the design upgrade in pretty much just those proportions. (Also inserted a lot of vines and trees, some weedy and some welcome natives.)
Over decades of associating with enthusiastic gardeners, I've come to realize that I'm not in the stratum of the completely plant-smitten. They are wonderful people (and have the most interesting plants!), but are never going to go for the simplifying reduction. However, there's still one effective way to unify any garden and doesn't involve getting rid of existing plants: repetition.
Posted by: Nell | Monday, March 12, 2018 at 06:40 PM
You are right on both counts: real plant collectors will never stop buying the latest plant and repetition is the key to a good garden design.
Posted by: Linda Brazill | Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 08:52 AM